高级检索

学术资源

行政法学

当前位置: 首页 -> 学术资源 -> 行政法学前沿 -> 行政法学 -> 正文

胡萧力:“邻避”冲突的决策难题与法律疏解

信息来源:《现代法学》2018年第3期 发布日期:2018-11-10

【参考文献】 {1}O’Hare. Not in My Back Yard, You Don’t: Facility Sitting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation[J].Public Policy, 1977,25(4):407-458.

{2}Bruno S. Frey, Felix Oberhoizer- Gee, Reiner Eichenberger. The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals & Markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1996,104(2):1297-1313.

{3}Audrey M. Armour. The Siting of Locally Unwanted Land Uses: Towards a Cooperative approach[J]. Progress in Planning, 1991,35(1):1-74.

{4}奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].郁宇峰,等,译.上海:三联书店上海分店,1995:8-14.

{5}Newell A. Simon H. A. Human problem solving [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

{6}张乐,童星.邻避行动的社会生成机制[J].江苏行政学院学报,2013(1):65-67.

{7}董幼鸿.重大事项社会稳定风险评估制度的实践与完善[J].中国行政管理,2011(12):80-83.

{8}安东尼·吉登斯.超越左与右——激进政治的未来[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:119.

{9}Amy Gutmann, Dennis Thompson.商议民主[M].谢宗学,郑惠文,译.台北:智胜文化事业有限公司,2006:7.

{10}Lawrence B. Solum. Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason[J]. San Diego Law Review, Vol.30,1993,30.{11}John Rawls. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited [J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1997,64(3):765-807.

{12}Juegen Habermas. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action[M]. MIT, 1993:65.

{13}龚全.理性的共性与公共理性[J].哲学研究,2009(11):110.

{14}卢瑾.当代西方协商民主理论研究:现状与启示[J].政治学研究,2008(5):103.

{15}冯辉.公共治理中的民粹倾向及其法治出路——以PX项目争议为样本[J].法学家,2015(2).

{16}王锡锌,章永乐.专家、大众与知识的运用——行政规则制定过程的一个分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2003(3):113-127.

{17}王锡锌.当代行政的“民主赤字”及其克服[J].法商研究,2009(1):42-52.

{18}Hamilton J T. Environmental Equity and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities in OECD Countries: Evidence and Policies[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2006,42(3):223-229.

{19}Lionel Fernandez. Siting Drug and Alcohol Treatment Programs: Legal Challenges to the NIMBY Syndrome, NIMBY technical assistance manual[J]. Legal Action Center, 1995:17.

{20}宋爽.不同环境规制工具影响污染产业投资的区域差异研究——基于省级工业面板数据对我国四大区域的实证分析[J].西部论坛,2017,27(2):90-99.

{21}陈建先.公平·正义·民主·规则:投票规则的价值取向[J].重庆理工大学学报,2017(7):67-72.

{22}Zimmerman M. A. Rappaport J. Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment[J]. American Journal of community psychology, 1988,16(5):725-750.

{23}金自宁.跨越专业门槛的风险交流与公众参与透视深圳西部通道环评事件[J].中外法学,2014(1):7-27.

{24}Portney, K. E. The potential of the theory of compensation for mitigating public opposition to hazardous waste treatment facility siting: Some evidence from five Massachusetts communities [J]. Policy Studies Journal, 1985,14(1),81.

{25}黄锦堂.由德国法之比较论我国邻避性设施设立许可程序之变革[M]//“行政院国家科学委员会”专题研究计划成果报告,台北:2004:19-20.

上一页 [1] [2] [3]