高级检索

学术资源

教育行政法

当前位置: 首页 -> 学术资源 -> 部门行政法学 -> 教育行政法 -> 正文

李烁:美国公立高校惩戒学生行为的正当程序

信息来源:《行政法学研究》2018年第5期 发布日期:2018-11-08

注释:
[①] Marie T. Reilly, “Due Process in Public University Discipline Cases,” Penn State Law Review, Vol.120, No.4, 2016, pp.1001-1026.
[②] 沈岿:《析论高校惩戒学生行为的司法审查》,载《华东政法学院学报》2005年第6期。
[③] 参见刘莘:《美国行政程序法概念辨析》,载《行政法学研究》1999年第2期。
[④] Dennis J. Christensen, “Democracy in the Classroom: Due Process and School Discipline,” Marquette Law Review, Vol.58, 1975, pp.708.
[⑤] 该案起因于一项纽约州禁止出售非医用烈性酒并禁止在住所之外的任何地方储放非用于销售的酒类的法律。纽约州法院认为,该法的实施,消灭和破坏了这个州的公民拥有烈性酒的财产权,这恐怕与正当程序条款的精神不符。
[⑥] 谢维雁:《论美国宪政下的正当法律程序》,载《社会科学研究》2003年第5期。
[⑦] Harris v. Blake, 798 F.2d 419, 424 (10th Cir. 1986).
[⑧] Carol J. Perkins, “Sylvester V. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions,” Journal of College and University Law, Vol.25, No.2, 1998-1999, pp.405.
[⑨] 该案的基本情况是美国国会在1875年制定了民权法案,禁止在火车旅馆、戏院等公共场所有种族歧视的情形。鉴于在实践中受到的种族歧视,五名黑人分别依据该法向法院提起诉讼,寻求救济。
[⑩] The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 13 (1883).
[11] 419U. S. 345 (1974).
[12] William I. Friedman, “The Fourteenth Amendment's Public/Private Distinction among Securities Regulators in the U.S. Marketplace-Revisited,” Annual Review of Banking & Financial Law, Vol.23, 2004, pp.735.
[13] Daphne Barak-Erez, “A State Action Doctrine for an Age of Privatization,” Syracuse Law Review, Vol.45, 1994, pp.1169-1192..
[14] Sylvester v. Texas Southern University 957F (S.D. Tex. 1997).
[15] Carol J. Perkins, “Sylvester V. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions,” pp.406-407.
[16] Gott v. Berea College, 156 Ky. 376, 161 S.W. 204 (1913).
[17] Elizabeth Lidgerwood Pendlay, “Procedure for Pupils: What Constitutes Due Process in a University Disciplinary Hearing?” North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 82, 2006, pp. 973.
[18] Carol J. Perkins, “Sylvester V. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions,” pp.406.
[19] Audrey Wolfson Latourette and Robert D. King, “Judicial Intervention in the Student-University Relationship: Due Process and Contract Theories,” University of Detroit Law Review, Vol. 65, 1988, pp.204.
[20] Elizabeth Lidgerwood Pendlay, “Procedure for Pupils: What Constitutes Due Process in a University Disciplinary Hearing?” pp. 976.
[21] Carol J. Perkins, “Sylvester V. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions,” pp.407.
[22] Elizabeth Lidgerwood Pendlay, “Procedure for Pupils: What Constitutes Due Process in a University Disciplinary Hearing?” pp. 974.
[23] Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565,95 S. Ct. 729 (1975).
[24] Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961).
[25] Elizabeth Lidgerwood Pendlay, “Procedure for Pupils: What Constitutes Due Process in a University Disciplinary Hearing?” pp. 977.
[26] Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961).
[27] Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565,95 S. Ct. 729 (1975).
[28] 韩兵:《高校基于学术原因惩戒学生行为的司法审查——以美国判例为中心的分析》,载《环球法律评论》2007年第3期。
[29] Greenhill v. Bailey, 519 F.2d 5 (8th Cir. 1975).
[30] Horowitz v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 538 F.2d 1317 (8th Cir. 1976)
[31] Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978).
[32] Thomas A. Schweitzer, “Academic Challenge Cases: Should Judicial Review Extend to Academic Evaluations of Students?” The American University Law Review, Vol.41, 1991-1992, pp.274.
[33] Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 US 319, 335(1976).
[34] Audrey Wolfson Latourette and Robert D. King, “Judicial Intervention in the Student-University Relationship: Due Process and Contract Theories,” pp.223.
[35] Thomas A. Schweitzer, “Academic Challenge Cases: Should Judicial Review Extend to Academic Evaluations of Students?” pp.307.
[36] Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (1985).
[37] Lisa L. Swem, “Due Process Rights in Student Disciplinary Matters,” Journal of College & University Law, Vol.14, 1987-1988, pp.359-362.
[38] Audrey Wolfson Latourette and Robert D. King, “Judicial Intervention in the Student-University Relationship: Due Process and Contract Theories,” pp.227.
[39] Haberle v. University of Ala. in Birmingham, 803 F.2d 1536, 1539 (11th Cir. 1986).
[40] 参见刘金晶:《法庭上的“自主高校”——论美国司法中的“学术遵从”原则》,载《环球法律评论》2011年第6期。

上一页 [1] [2]